Anybody want to join this analysis?

[deelaundry]

Bammel? Sabine? Spoggly? Namaste?

queenzulu makes a compelling case for a House-AU of mine being anti-feminist here. It's very thought-provoking. Anything you'd be interested to add? I'd love to hear more analysis and opinions.

Please note that this is critical analysis of text/writing, not of me as a person. There is implication throughout the commentary about an author's responsibility for the end product of a work, which is an important idea that needs to be considered.

Comments

[deelaundry.livejournal.com]

Yep, it was because other men witnessed James "being disrespectful." If they'd been alone, House wouldn't have mentioned it to anyone (even though not reporting it is a violation of the Code). As James says at the end, James will have to act as a man at home and as a woman -- based on their society's restrictive rules about that -- when around other people.

No, there's no way Greg could have refused to punish James. As it said in the fic, the Code is clear that the "offended party" has to carry out the discipline.

I have planned sequels but I don't know when I'll finish them. Could be years : ) The next sequel, though, would definitely be about Cameron and the children of the House line.