Nope. What he wanted was the money, that's why he took the case in the first place. He did what he did because he (rightly) believed that the patient was still sick.
I fail to see how it would have been moral for him to compromise his own patient's health just to do Wilson a favour and let him have a donation that was morally dubious in the first place.
(no subject)
Date: 2011-10-19 12:49 pm (UTC)Nope. What he wanted was the money, that's why he took the case in the first place. He did what he did because he (rightly) believed that the patient was still sick.
I fail to see how it would have been moral for him to compromise his own patient's health just to do Wilson a favour and let him have a donation that was morally dubious in the first place.
(This is Felis btw, can't log in atm.)