deelaundry: (Default)
This is a thing Bironic and Nightdog do, so why not me?

April 2017 (not complete, who cares)

Mockingjay - book - FINALLY FINISHED THIS SERIES! - Impressions: I liked the third book, made sense that Katniss was removed from the action, THIS is how you do a slight spoiler ) epilogue (side-eyeing you hard, HP) - Ideas: H/W fusion fic; Peeta vid for Vividcon

Mockingjay part 1 - movie - I don't like how few people were in the conf room in 13 - not the right feel, I would've preferred we stayed in Katniss POV (though I can see why the filmmakers would've made the decision)

Mockingjay part 2 - movie - Tigris was too pretty, some changes in pods were good and some weren't, mutts were as scary as I had pictured them, wonder if author wrote the Snow part specifically for Donald Sutherland because he FALLS INTO THAT PART oh so chilling, J Law is a good actor but they still should have given an olive-skinned actress this part

Ex Machina - movie - UGH. The core tenets of the movie are repellently misogynistic and I find it disappointing that Mr. L and apparently every film critic ever doesn't get how repellent it is.

How to Get Away with Murder Season 3 - tv - woot! like a fanfic on film in terms of pure feels fulfillment, I am reminded of Sue's line on Glee about how it's hard to keep track of couples with how often the partners change, sometimes I have to ask myself, 'Now who am I supposed to be empathizing with this ep?' Viola Davis is a very good actor, Bon-Bon is a lying liar who lies (everybody else I think I know what's a lie and what's truth but not her).
deelaundry: (Default)
Hi! It's been forever, sorry.

Has anyone seen the 2015 movie Ex Machina (now on Netflix US; stars Poe & Gen. Hux from Star Wars)? I need someone to talk to about my reaction, but I don't want any of my friends who haven't seen it to have to sit through it and potentially suffer my reaction. Which basically boils down to: Wow, way to say that the only value is fuckability, and to erase women entirely! Thank you for supporting millennia of misogyny!!!!
deelaundry: (folder)
Title: Friends, or The Mystery of the Vanishing Girl
Author: Dee Laundry
Fandom: Sherlock BBC
Characters: John Watson, Sherlock Holmes, Mike Stamford, OC (Mike's wife, Karen Stamford)
Rating: PG-13
Summary: Even though John is family, he wasn’t at The Holmes Family Recital. This is why not.
Notes: SPOILERS for all of Series Four of Sherlock. Dialogue-only. This is slightly tongue-in-cheek but only slightly. Written for Exhibition-of-vanishing-time on Tumblr, whose LJ/DW name I've forgotten.


You won't be there? )
deelaundry: (Sherlock)
...a good beta. Someone to say them, "Well, ok, but why? What's the overall gist of what you're trying to accomplish here? Alright, given that, why is this scene here? Why does this character say that, and do that? You've shown a gun in act one, so how are you going to make it go off before the story's done? And literary license is a thing, but you've gone over the line into supernatural, even given the AU you're writing. How would this have occurred -- I mean literally how, walk me through it, even if you're not going to cover it in the plot, you have to have thought through the actual steps. And this, this, and this would be more effective if dialed back a bit. I get this is all about the adventure but if you're going to say that the character has emotionally progressed, you have to show that the character has emotionally progressed."

I can personally recommend [personal profile] bironic, [personal profile] daisylily, [personal profile] nightdog_barks, and [personal profile] thedeadparrot for this important role, although you may not be able to afford them...

I ficced!

Jan. 1st, 2017 11:32 am
deelaundry: (folder)
What a way to start the year!

:)

It's teeny but I like it. Thank you, [personal profile] blackmare and [personal profile] menolly_au, for kicking it off.

Part three of One New Year's Eve




deelaundry: (Default)
All credit to intjwoo on Tumblr for this one. I almost choked laughing when I got to ISTJ. Original post here

What actually runs in the veins of the 16 Myers-Briggs types

ENTJ: The crushed souls of the defeated

INTJ: Ice

ENTP: Memes

INTP: Nothing. They don’t have veins. They’re robots.

ENFJ: Liquid gold

INFJ: Ambrosia

ENFP: Margarita mix

INFP: Tears

ESTJ: Caffeine

ISTJ: Blood, because that’s what’s supposed to be there

ESTP: Vodka

ISTP: Gasoline

ESFJ: Hot chocolate

ISFJ: Cookie butter

ESFP: Glitter

ISFP: Rain

Source: intjwoo
deelaundry: (Default)
I've been watching the TV series Bones on Netflix. Formulaic mysteries with humor; it's awesome. Anyway, since it's all about murders there have been bones and bugs and tissue pieces and blood, and I've made it through all that with no problem. But this episode (s9 e22) they've been talking about fingernail beds and my body has gone NOPE NOPE NOPE NOPE NOPE. Interesting that this would be the one thing that would do me in.

Meme

Nov. 21st, 2016 08:24 pm
deelaundry: (Default)
I Am A: Lawful Neutral Human Wizard (5th Level)


Ability Scores:

Strength-9

Dexterity-10

Constitution-10

Intelligence-16

Wisdom-11

Charisma-12


Alignment:
Lawful Neutral A lawful neutral character acts as law, tradition, or a personal code directs him. Order and organization are paramount to him. He may believe in personal order and live by a code or standard, or he may believe in order for all and favor a strong, organized government. Lawful neutral is the best alignment you can be because it means you are reliable and honorable without being a zealot. However, lawful neutral can be a dangerous alignment when it seeks to eliminate all freedom, choice, and diversity in society.


Race:
Humans are the most adaptable of the common races. Short generations and a penchant for migration and conquest have made them physically diverse as well. Humans are often unorthodox in their dress, sporting unusual hairstyles, fanciful clothes, tattoos, and the like.


Class:
Wizards are arcane spellcasters who depend on intensive study to create their magic. To wizards, magic is not a talent but a difficult, rewarding art. When they are prepared for battle, wizards can use their spells to devastating effect. When caught by surprise, they are vulnerable. The wizard's strength is her spells, everything else is secondary. She learns new spells as she experiments and grows in experience, and she can also learn them from other wizards. In addition, over time a wizard learns to manipulate her spells so they go farther, work better, or are improved in some other way. A wizard can call a familiar- a small, magical, animal companion that serves her. With a high Intelligence, wizards are capable of casting very high levels of spells.


Find out What Kind of Dungeons and Dragons Character Would You Be?, courtesy of Easydamus (e-mail)

Uh

Nov. 9th, 2016 06:40 am
deelaundry: (Default)
I am not looking forward to the next four years. A demagogue in the Oval and a Republican-controlled Congress in the next two years means no immediate path to get him out.
deelaundry: (Default)
Bironic and I both wanted desperately to shout, “THREESOME!” when the characters kept asking, “If we love each other, and we both love him, what should we do?”

Because, seriously, threesome. That is what you do when you have three people who all love each other.

I get that heteronormativity exists, but since the play already established that the WEATHER IS CONTROLLED BY ROYAL DECREE, Arthur could just go, “Yep, married to both of them, shut up.”
deelaundry: (Default)
Saw Camelot last weekend with [personal profile] bironic, and it was very fun.

The reviews have been uneven to say the least so I was a bit worried going in, but I loved it! Looking back at the reviews, they’re mostly like, This isn’t as elaborate as the three-hour version with Julie Andrews so boo to this.

I’ve never seen the three-hour version to compare it to, so I took this version on its own merits and thought it was quite fun. They did have some occasions when they very blatantly had a symbol stand in for something more elaborate (e.g., covered the floor in red to show that Arthur was standing where a battle had recently taken place) -- that worked for me. They didn’t try to pretend; they very clearly indicated when things were symbols. Another example: rather than close the curtain and move things on the set, they had the actors move things on the set. Generally that was done with a choreographed flourish from the actors, indicating “Ta da! We are doing this transition now!”

The set design in general was one I loved. Use of warm woods, movable set pieces, tall arches placed in foreground, midground and background for a sense of scale. In contrast to say, Prodigal Son, where the minimalist design of the outdoor scenes were too minimal for my taste, the set design in this version of Camelot gave a good sense of place in each scene.

Now why did I choose to see a play at a theater located 300 miles from my home? Robert Sean Leonard, naturally. He played Arthur, and looked good. He was SO MUCH more comfortable showing affection to Guenevere (played by a very good actress named Britney Coleman, who Bironic recognized as having been in A Very Potter Musical on YouTube) than he’s been in anything else ever, so that was nice. It looked like he had grown a tummy on him, but I don’t see how that’s possible in the few weeks since promo pics, so maybe that was the costume.

Singing isn't RSL's greatest strength but he acquitted himself fine (other than dropping the end of some of his words, seriously, RSL, finish what you start). He slid into the Rex Harrison/Robert Preston sing/talk mode (see the 1964 film My Fair Lady and the 1962 film Music Man if you don't know what I mean) and that was fine.

Did you see the promo vid where he was dancing, and it looked kind of dorky and uncoordinated? That scene takes place in Arthur & Guenevere’s bedroom, and they are joking around. So it’s supposed to look a little bit dorky and impromptu. :)

One amazingly fun part that wasn't RSL: Mordred, the villain. Bironic and I agreed immediately that he was very reminiscent of Seth Green ("Scott Evil!" I said) and that we loved the sparkle seen in his thighs and personality, both. ([personal profile] bironic's full write-up, which is better than mine, is here.

The actors didn’t come out afterward, so no autograph or close-up encounter, unfortunately. But all in all, it was a great time and I’m glad I went.

I'm even more glad that I chose to travel the way I did because it meant a lot more time with Bironic, and that was even better than the play. <3 <3 <3

Next up for RSL: back to San Diego to play Richard II in summer 2017.

Next up for me: Going to the UK for work in a few weeks and getting to see my awesome RSL-loving friend [personal profile] daisylily!

Dorky dancing that I was talking about:
deelaundry: (Default)
Here is a good thing that I’m happy about:

The elementary school my younger son (Littlest Laundry) goes to treats him like an individual. \o/ He had a meltdown Friday and ended up hitting a teacher and two students. The school’s first priority was keeping him (and the others) safe and finding a way to help him calm down. Then they talked with me and my husband about the best next steps. The school district’s code is strict about consequences for physical violence (as it should be) but the principal, teachers, and counselor knew that my son’s violence wasn’t malicious. So they came up with a consequence for him that is fair given the circumstances. I feel blessed.

PS. Yes, the rumors are true, [personal profile] bironic and I did see RSL in Camelot. It was fun! More on that later.
deelaundry: (Default)
Interviewed for a new job and was asked about my international experience. I immediately thought of all the lovely people all over the world I’ve met through fandom, LJ/DW, and Tumblr.

However, I refrained from talking about all the porn we’ve shared with each other through the years. *hugs hugs hugs*



PS. I got the job.

PPS. I already told them I'm taking Friday, July 29 off for "a personal day." Again, not mentioning that I'm going to Con-Txt and modding a panel on how to write sex scenes featuring more than two characters.

PPPS. Assuming that panel got voted in.
deelaundry: (Default)
I think Prodigal Son would have been much more interesting from the point of view of RSL's character, Alan Hoffman, and here's why.

Spoilers for Prodigal Son; content warning for talk of exploitation )
deelaundry: (Default)
My review of Prodigal Son. Others have other reviews, and I am not taking away from them, but here is mine:

Eh. Basically, I spent $90 plus travel to see Robert Sean Leonard in person and that was worth it to me (even though he didn’t have Stage Door so I didn’t see him up close), but if he hadn’t been in the play, I would have been angry to spend that much.

My biggest problem with the play is the play itself, not the production.

It could have said something about class, but it doesn’t.

It could have said something about betrayal, but it doesn’t.

It could have said something about external vs. internal conceptions of right and wrong, but it doesn’t.

It tells a story I have heard way too often to have any patience for: able straight cis white Christian late-teen boy screws up repeatedly, hurts others, gets coddled for no real reason, doesn’t appreciate what he has, and whines for more.

I thought of Marley Dias, and how she could sum up her required reading as “white boy with dog.”

Acting-wise, Timothee Chalamet was very good; I was drawn in by his performance. Annika Boras’s acting was very good, although I wanted to adjust her volume up. Chris McGarry was very, very touching. He should’ve been on the posters.

RSL, I enjoyed watching, as always, though I felt sometimes he was apologizing for the material. It would be interesting to know what his discussions with the writer/director were. And one pivotal scene fell flat due to RSL’s continued inability to make a certain action believable. Some day, some day. Maybe.

If you’re a fan of Timothee Chalamet or are willing to pay $90 to look at RSL, you can give this a try. Otherwise, I hear Fun Home is really good.

PS. Where does fic come from? From the places canon didn't go. Here's my fic (BIG spoilers): http://deelaundry.dreamwidth.org/23936.html
deelaundry: (folder)
This doesn't have a title yet, and it's short, but I think it's done.

Huge spoilers for the Prodigal Son (play). Rated PG-13. Catholic imagery, mentions of death. I told [personal profile] bironic that the play would have been more interesting if it was from Alan's point of view.


I don't want you writing about me )
deelaundry: (Default)
Waiting (semi-)patiently for the Sherlock special. Haven't decided yet whether I'll watch at the UK time or wait for US.


I watched the first season of The Flash this weekend on Netflix. Cheesy popcorn, but fun!! And SO MANY HOT GUY BODIES. O_O It also has better continuity than most of the shows I've liked (House MD hissssssssssssss).

RSL could guest star and fit in with all the male weeping, heh.

Felicity was my favorite character. (One of my kind, I'm just saying)

Favorite line: "I am your father" said by Luke Skywalker :rotf:

Second favorite line: "Am I the only one here who watches movies?" :rotf:
deelaundry: (Default)
So what have you been up to?
Um, nothing? Too much? One of those two.

Major life changes? Same old same old?
Same house, same spouse, same job. Trying to explain to my new therapist why "enjoying being online" does not mean I'm going to emotionally cheat on my spouse. Y'all know me; forming deep emotional bonds with live people is not why I'm here. (Which is not to say I don't love my online friends! I do!)

What fandom are you in/do you spend most of your time in?
Sherlock BBC and Robert Sean Leonard and House MD, plus whatever passes by on my Tumblr, including Steve Rogers and Peggy Carter being bisexual, and Sam Wilson being the love interest.

Where do you hang out online?
Tumblr (https://www.tumblr.com/blog/deelaundry) and reading on AO3. I am going to try to be more active on DW and LJ.

What are you reading?
Making my way steadily through Agatha Christie's oeuvre again. It's a completist thing. Just finished The Harlequin Tea Set; They Came to Baghdad is next. Also will be taking Ancillary Justice on my summer vacay.

What are you watching?
The Nightly Show, and can't wait to see what's next for The Daily Show. I watch the Poirot eps on Netflix after I finish each Poirot book, to see what they changed in the plot and for the cool guest stars (Bashir! The Ninth Doctor! Mary Morstan! (whose character was a teacher who'd been in trouble for being inappropriate with a male older-teen student, not that that's delicious or anything...)). Loved The Unbreakable Kimmy Schmidt and Sense8; can't wait for the new seasons. I'm also caught up (I think) on the Marvel movies.

What are you making?
Nothing, sadly. I do have an idea for a group-activity Sick!Wilson vid, maybe I'll start that soon...

What are you squeeing about today?
RSL is going back to NYC!!!


What else is on your mind?
Today the clerk at the drugstore reminded me so much of Jack Wilson, I had to sit for a second afterward and grin. I miss Jack; I miss writing.
deelaundry: (Jack 2)
Now We Are Six was Jack Wilson's bedtime book last night because, well, now we are six.

Happy Birthday, sweetheart. Thank you for the joy you've given me.

Profile

deelaundry: (Default)
Dee Laundry

April 2017

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9 101112 131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30      

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags